• Users Online: 302
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 26-38

Households' incidence on Malaria and expenditures to treat Malaria in Sudan: What role does use of different vector control tools play in Rural and Urban locations?


1 Health Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria
2 Health Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria, and Ministry of Health, Anambra State, Nigeria
3 Health Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Department of Health Administration and Management; Department of Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria, and Ministry of Health, Anambra State, Nigeria
4 Ministry of Health, Sudan

Correspondence Address:
O E Onwujekwe
Health Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Department of Health Administration and Management, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4314/jcm.v18i1.4

Rights and Permissions

Background: Malaria is the major health problem in Sudan and accounts for more than 40% of health facility visits and 35,000 deaths in Sudan. Although treatable, it affects people from different socio-economic status (SES), causing suffering and poor socio-economic development. Objectives: To explore the relationship between use of different malaria control tools and household expenditure for malaria treatment especially in children under five. Methods: The study was undertaken in 6 localities in Gezira and Khartoum states in Sudan. 720 randomly selected households were interviewed using a pre-tested interviewer - administered questionnaire. Household incidence and expenditure for malaria in different age groups was used to compare the use of different malaria control tools for malaria treatment in rural and urban communities. Results: The highest incidence of malaria elicited from respondents was 29.0% and mean expenditure was 3235.5 Dinars (US$12). It was found that there was high incidence of malaria and large expenditure on treatment on households with insecticide treated-bed net (ITN) and in-door residual house spraying (IRHS). Conclusion: The relationship between expenditure and use of different vector control depends on the geographic location of respondents. People living in the rural areas spend more to have access to malaria control tools. Location of respondent has a positive effect on expenditures and use of malaria control tools. The National Malaria Administration (NMA) and (SMA) State Malaria Administration should continually determine the access that the poorest and high risk households have to IRHS and ITNs. Financial riak protection mechanism are needed to ameliorate the expenditures on malaria control tool, which mostly paid from out of pocket.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed309    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded66    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal